What drives ocean currents?

Welcome to the second installment of the Science on Main ocean-related blog posts! This week's topic comes from a part of the field called physical oceanography. This piece of the broader field of oceanography focuses on understanding the large-scale forces that drive ocean events, including currents, the topic of this week's post.

For most, especially anyone who has seen the movie Finding Nemo (Disney-Pixar, 2003), the fact that the ocean has currents is old news. Ocean currents are powerful features of their environments, continually pushing large volumes of water from one location to another, potentially thousands of miles away. One of the most famous ocean currents is the Gulf Stream, which is part of a larger circulation current called a gyre. There are five major gyres in the oceans: the north Atlantic, south Atlantic, north Pacific, south Pacific, and Indian.

Figure 1: The deflection of air currents due to the
Coriolis Effect

In the northern hemisphere, the gyres circulate in a clockwise direction. In the southern hemisphere, they circulate in a counter-clockwise direction. This is due to the Coriolis Effect. The Coriolis Effect is the name for the deflection of air currents in the atmosphere due to the rotation of the earth underneath it. If Earth didn't rotate, the air would naturally flow in a straight line from the high-pressure areas around the poles to the low-pressure equatorial area. Air deflects in opposite directions in the northern and southern hemispheres because of the direction of earth's rotation (Figure 1). So what does this have to do with ocean currents?

You may be surprised to learn that it is actually the wind that drives surface ocean currents! Each of the oceanic gyres has one eastern and one western boundary current, for a total of 10 major currents in the modern day oceans. The eastern boundary current is usually wider and travels slower, while the western boundary current is narrower and travels quickly. This is because the winds that drive surface currents are deflected out, the start to lose energy. Since they spiral west to east, the air currents are stronger on the western sides. The air pushes and shears the surface of the ocean, which causes the water to follow along. This is part of why hurricanes with high winds can produce huge waves and strong ocean currents.

Figure 2: The Gulf Stream. Warm colors represent warm water,
carried by the current to England and northern Europe.

One of the most famous currents is the Gulf Stream, which carries warm, nutrient-rich water from the Caribbean, up the east coast of the United States, and then up and over to England, Iceland, and the Norwegian Sea. Despite England's high latitude, it has a relatively mild climate, and it is primarily due to the Gulf Stream, and the water it carries with it.

The Gulf Stream is only a surface current, however. There are also currents that bring nutrients from deep in the ocean to the surface, which are used to feed phytoplankton and other small animals. As phytoplankton may be responsible for up to 80% of all organic matter on Earth, it's important to keep them fed! These deep currents also bring oxygen with them, which every animal needs to survive. Water that has no oxygen in it are called hypoxic, and cannot support life. Without these deep currents, life in the oceans could not survive.

One example of phytoplankton, a diatom called
Amphiprora. From Dawn Moran, WHOI.

Deep ocean currents carry water along the bottom of the ocean, collecting nutrients and oxygen, before they are brought to the surface. This changes some of the water's properties within the current, including its density. When the density of the water on the bottom of the ocean is less than the density of the water above it, the ocean begins to overturn. There are specific locations in the oceans where upwelling occurs, when less dense water rises to the surface, and locations where the opposite, downwelling, happens. This density-driven circulation is necessary to keep the surface water healthy for all the plants and animals that rely on it.

It is important to study the oceans because they are responsible for moderating climate, driving weather, and maintaining the global food-web. Currents are an important piece of the puzzle of how the oceans work, as they transport materials from one place to another, but there are still many questions that remain. If you studied the ocean, what question would you want to work on? What do you think would happen if all ocean currents suddenly disappeared?

Sources:
https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/education/kits/currents/05currents1.html
https://oceanexplorer.noaa.gov/facts/currents.html
https://www.nationalgeographic.org/encyclopedia/coriolis-effect/
http://www.edc.uri.edu/restoration/html/gallery/plants/phyto.htm
https://www.whoi.edu/main/topic/phytoplankton

Can Sharks get Rabies?

Last Friday, September 14, we had another Science on Main event on Main Street in Mesa, AZ. This month's theme was Pirates' Block Party, which conjures images of the sea, Jolly Roger flags, and colorful men and women who defied the laws of the powerful Navies of the day. In honor of this theme, the next few blog articles will be on topics related to the ocean and all its mysteries.

One of the best parts of being part of Science on Main is when I hear a question I've never before considered. This week's blog topic is a question that we were asked by a young scientist a few months ago, and it's one that definitely took me by surprise. Can sharks get rabies?

Jim Abernethy, National Geographic Creative

Rabies is a viral disease that is transmitted between animals and people via bodily fluids, usually through bites but rarely through scratches. According to the World Heath Organization (WHO), up to 99% of all rabies infections come from bites from domestic dogs, especially in countries like India, where there are many stray dogs. In the Americas and some southeast Asian countries, bats are the most common carriers. Most rabies deaths today (95%) occur in Africa and Asia, and up to 40% are in children under the age of 15, who may not recognize the signs of a rabid animal. These signs include hyperactivity, a fear of water or drafts, and partial paralysis, especially around the infection site.

Rabies is almost always fatal, and was responsible for many deaths up until the late 1800s. Thankfully, Louis Pasteur and Émile Roux developed the first rabies vaccine in 1885. If a human was bitten by a rabid animal and received treatment within 10 days, that person was very likely to survive. According to WHO, over 15 million people per year receive a post-bite rabies vaccination, which saves an estimated hundreds of thousands of lives. More vaccines have been developed since and are used to prevent infection in the first place. If you have a pet dog in the United States, chances are high you've had to get this vaccine for your pet from the vet!

Dog bites are the #1 cause of rabies in humans.
Picture from Anoir Chafik via Unsplash

Now that we understand what rabies is, we can approach the original question regarding sharks. One interesting fact is that rabies is a disease that occurs only in mammals. No animal other than mammals has ever been reported as rabid. Birds were artificially infected with rabies in 1884, but they developed few or no symptoms, and always recovered. A study in 1988 confirmed that blood from infected birds contained "no significant antibody titers," and therefore supported the conclusion that wild birds are not a significant source for rabies. Curiously, though rats and rodents can be vectors for other serious diseases, rodents are rarely found to be infected with rabies, and no cases of rodents transmitting rabies to humans have been reported.

Sharks are not mammals, so it is not possible for them to get rabies. It is hard to imagine a shark getting bitten by a dog anyway! But there are many mammals that live in the sea. Could they get rabies?

Simply put, the answer is yes, but it is very, very rare. In the Arctic regions in northern Canada and Alaska, the Artic fox is the main rabies carrier, as one of the only canid species in the area. In 1980, rabies was detected in 12 foxes, 3 reindeer, and one ringed seal in Svalbard, an archipelago near the North Pole. The seal that had contracted rabies was found 200 m away from a blow hole, where a seal will come up for air while swimming under the thick ice. A subsequent rabies screening of hundreds of animals all came up negative. This may be the first known case of rabies in a marine mammal.

Luna, an Arctic fox at the Maryland Zoo in Baltimore.

Foxes are known to prey on young seal and walrus pups, which may be where they come into contact with the adults. If an infected fox bites a seal, the seal can develop rabies. But this is a very rare and usually accidental event, and "there is no indication that rabies is endemic in" Arctic fox, seal, and reindeer populations.

There is one case of rabies reported in a polar bear. In 1989, this bear was found dragging its back legs 1.2 km inland in northern Canada, and was shot dead by a group on Inuit hunters, who left the meat untouched because of the unusual circumstances of its death. Scientists tested its spinal fluid and found evidence for partial paralysis and rabies antibodies, confirming the bear was indeed rabid. No other polar bear has ever been reported to be carrying rabies.

People should always be careful and wary of all wild animals, whose behavior is unpredictable. Animals who are acting unusually should absolutely be avoided and reported to local wildlife authorities. That being said, the risk of contracting rabies is especially low, and should never stop you from enjoying the outdoor world. What are you waiting for?

Sources: 
http://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/rabies
http://www.jwildlifedis.org/doi/abs/10.7589/0090-3558-24.2.264?code=wdas-site
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Morten_Tryland/publication/292257698_Zoonoses_of_arctic_marine_mammals/links/5707a27108aea66081331319/Zoonoses-of-arctic-marine-mammals.pdf
http://www.jwildlifedis.org/doi/abs/10.7589/0090-3558-27.2.337?code=wdas-site
https://www.jstor.org/stable/3560403?origin=crossref&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents

The History of the Spherical Earth Idea

When I was in elementary school, I learned that the Earth was round. I even remember a silly rhyme in a cartoon I watched in school about Christopher Columbus, who "proved" the Earth was round. To me, the fact that the Earth is round seems almost like an instinct. That being said, I never looked up the history of why and how it's known the Earth is round. Today I started to correct that.

The idea that the Earth is a sphere can be traced back as far as the ancient Greeks. Although the idea is attributed to Pythagoras, a Greek polymath most famous for his Pythagorean theorem of triangles, both he and his contemporary Parmenides of Elea are known to have taught the idea of a spherical Earth. Moreover, it is possible the discovery was made by another Greek and falsely associated with Pythagoras by historians. Aristarchus and Eratosthenes improved on this work by estimating the circumference of the Earth, and noting how the visible constellations changed as the observer traveled nearer to and farther from the equator.

It is also possible that other cultures (Chinese dynastic empires, African tribes, Egypt, and Native Peoples in the Americas) noted evidence that the Earth was round, but few, if any, records of these people survive. Future discoveries may change this. In ancient India, for example, a Greek ethnographer wrote in 300 B.C.E. that the Brahmans (the high scholarly caste in Hindu society) believed that the spherical Earth was the center of the universe. As Hellenistic ideas spread via Alexander the Great's conquest, the Greek ideas merged with those of the Brahmans, and survived well into the next millennium. Aryabhatta I, an classic Indian astronomer and mathematician who lived from 476–550 C.E., wrote in his work, the Aryabhattiya, that the Earth was spherical. He also made an incredibly accurate estimation of the Earth's circumference of 4,967 yojanas, which is equivalent to 24,835 miles. The equatorial value of Earth's circumference is today calculated at 24,901 miles.

In any case, the spherical Earth idea was a moderately popular one in the ancient world, as it persisted throughout Greek dominance and was later adopted by Roman astronomers as the standard. Later on, Ptolemy of Alexandria wrote one of his best-known books, Almagest, in which he defended and built on the arguments for a spherical Earth. He also argued that the Earth could curve in both north/south and east/west directions. The Almagest remained one of the standard astronomy texts for the next 1,400 years. As Europe experienced its Medieval period, the knowledge of a spherical Earth was retained by monks translating ancient Greek and Roman texts. It was also kept alive, and eventually reintroduced to Europe, by many Muslim astronomers, including Ibn Hazm, Al-farghānī (Alfraganus), and Abu Rayhan Biruni. These and other early scholars used this information to develop spherical geometry, an important tool still very much in use today.

A page from Almagest. U.S. Library of Congress.

So exactly how did they all know that the Earth is spherical? Much of it came from the knowledge of sailors. For example, as mountains appeared over the horizon from the top down. Had the Earth been flat, the mountains should have appeared in full as soon as the ship passed any obstructing object in front of it. Another piece of evidence is the shape of the terminator on the moon. A solar terminator is the line that divides the "day" from the "night" side of a planetary body. For us here on Earth, it's the line edge of the shadow that passes over the Moon when it's not full. Ancient astronomers recognized this line as a representation of the shape of the Earth as it passed between the Moon and the Sun. This line is curved, and so the shape of the Earth must too be curved.

https://www.farmersalmanac.com/terminator-22380

Finally, there was the sky itself. The sun is always directly above one point on Earth at solar noon, and this happens predictably for a single location on a yearly schedule. The north star, Polaris, never moves from its place in the night sky, but its declination, or height above the horizon, does change with an observer's latitude on Earth. There are also stars that are not visible from certain points on Earth. If the Earth were flat, then all stars should be visible at all times, as a view from a plane should only rotate in one direction. This logic, coupled with knowledge of geometry, was yet more evidence for a spherical Earth.

Of course, the fact that Ferdinand Magellan and his company sailed completely around the globe between 1519 and 1522 was perhaps the most solid piece of evidence for a spherical Earth before the space age. Now, satellites have orbited the Earth, Moon, Mars, Mercury, Jupiter, and Saturn, returning pictures of all of these that show they are spherical. It would not be possible to orbit a flat plane. Why planets are spherical is another discussion. For now, it is enough to discuss an abridged history of the spherical Earth idea and a few of many pieces of evidence that support it.

Sources:
Burkert, Walter (1 June 1972), Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, ISBN 0-674-53918-4, page 306.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spherical_Earth
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-are-planets-round/
https://www.livescience.com/60544-ways-to-prove-earth-is-round.html
Direct adoption by India: D. Pingree: "History of Mathematical Astronomy in India", Dictionary of Scientific Biography, Vol. 15 (1978), pp. 533–633 (554f.); Glick, Thomas F., Livesey, Steven John, Wallis, Faith (eds.): "Medieval Science, Technology, and Medicine: An Encyclopedia", Routledge, New York 2005, ISBN 0-415-96930-1, p. 463
Cormack, Lesley B. (2015), "That before Columbus, geographers and other educated people thought the Earth was flat", in Numbers, Ronald L.; Kampourakis, Kostas, Newton's Apple and Other Myths about Science, Harvard University Press, pp. 16–22, ISBN 9780674915473
Otto E. Neugebauer (1975). "A History of Ancient Mathematical Astronomy". Birkhäuser: 577. ISBN 3-540-06995-X. 

Movie Science: Alpha

I saw the movie Alpha with friends last Saturday night. When my friends and I go see movies, we whisper to each other the whole time, pointing out flaws in both the plot and the science it implies. Alpha was a rare treat for me: a movie that highlighted large-scale terrain and large, extinct animals. I knew I would like it.

The movie begins with a sequence of landscape shots, some with animals. The first animals we see are woolly mammoths, traveling in a characteristic herd. A few seconds later, a small group of woolly rhinoceros move through what appears to be a glacier-scarred landscape. Hyena and wolf packs prowl and vocalize. Words appear on the screen informing us that the setting is Europe, 20,000 years ago.

With a date and general location, it is now straightforward to examine the science behind the plot. 20,000 years ago puts the movie near the end of the Pleistocene period, otherwise known by its more famous alias, the "Ice Age." There's a lot to say about the science behind the many ice ages of Earth, so we'll save that for another blog post. This one will focus on the animals seen in the movie, and whether or not they belong there.

First up is identifying the animals seen in the opening sequence. Elasmotherium could be the woolly rhinoceros, as it lived in Europe in the Pleistocene, but the youngest fossils date from 29,000 years ago, slightly before the movie's setting. Another genus of animals, Stephanorhinos, also lived in continental Europe around the same time, but it's not as woolly as the ones in the movie, and their horns are a bit short. My guess is that the animals are Elasmotherium, and maybe they are the last of their kind alive. In any case, it checks out.

American Mammoth skeleton on display at the George C. Page Museum. Photo credit: J. Noviello

The most iconic animal of the Pleistocene is the mammoth, and it's no surprise those animals appear early in the film (though it's a shame that they aren't seen again). The oldest woolly mammoth fossils are found in east Asia. From there mammoths migrated out, eventually evolving into a few different species. Europe was definitely one of those places, as their bones are fairly common in many countries, and mammoths are seen in cave paintings made by ancient humans. While most mammoths were extinct by 10,000 years ago, small populations of isolated animals may have survived until as late as 4,000 years ago. One quick note is that the mastodon is a totally different animal from the mammoth, and only found (so far) in north and central America. This one too checks out.

The humans in the movie (which are very likely true Homo sapiens, even though Neanderthals certainly inhabited the area) are first seen hunting buffalo. This checks out as well, as there are many different species of bison in the Pleistocene fossil record. The length and curvature of the horns, as well as the size of the bison itself, at first made me think of Bison latifrons, but that animal only lived in North America. A better choice for the buffalo hunted in the movie is the steppe bison, Bison priscus, as it was a widespread species and definitely lived in Europe; it also makes many appearances in cave paintings, especially at the Cave of Lascaux in France. This checks out too.

From: https://www.lascaux.fr/en/prepare-your-visit/visit-lascaux/lascaux-2

Wolves and hyenas also check out, though the animals seen in the movies are their modern-day counterparts. Cave hyenas were massive, about twice the size of extant hyenas. Judging from the presence of bones in different caves, it appears that cave hyenas and humans actively hunted each other, or at least scavenged from each other's kills. These hyenas lived across Europe and Asia until about 20,000 years ago, after which their populations severely declined. In any case, this too checks out. Of course wolves check out because we know that dogs are descended from wolves, so the question becomes what kind of wolves these are. While I initially thought they could be dire wolves, they are only found in North America. The wolves in the movie are probably simple cave wolves.

Finally, there is the closest thing to a villain in the movie: the saber-tooth cat. While we only are ever shown a shadowy outline of the beast that kills a hunter early in the film, its profile is unmistakable. Sabre-tooth cats (the most famous of which is Smilodon fatalis, though there are a few) were fearsome predators that went extinct about 10,000 years ago, so the timeline checks out. Now onto where they lived. The most famous location for their bones is the La Brea Tar Pits in Los Angeles, California, but they are found as far south as Argentina. While saber-tooth cats were thought to be extinct in Europe as early as 300,000 years ago, a new jawbone discovered in the Netherlands has been dated to as late as 28,000 years ago, significantly later than what scientists originally thought! Therefore, while it is far more likely that saber-tooth cats lived in the Americas around the time of the movie, it is not impossible they were also in Europe. This checks out, albeit tenuously.

Maybe it's because I'm a scientist at heart, and that prehistoric animals are very close to my heart, but while watching this movie, I automatically evaluated it. I try to remember that it's been made for entertainment purposes, not for education. Even so I can appreciate attention to detail, and I think Alpha did a good job overall representing the paleobiology of Pleistocene Europe. And, if I may say so myself, the movie itself was good too.

Sources:
https://www.nature.com/news/sabre-toothed-cats-prowled-europe-200-000-years-after-supposedly-going-extinct-1.22861
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cave_hyena
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steppe_bison
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megafaunal_wolf#cite_note-goldfuss1823-4
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woolly_mammoth
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elasmotherium